@conference {1536,
	title = {The importance of native bees to rabbiteye blueberry pollination},
	booktitle = {Third Biennial Southeast Blueberry Conference},
	year = {1986},
	month = {1986///},
	address = {Tifton, GA},
	keywords = {ANTHOPHORIDAE, APIDAE, APIS, BOMBUS, BUZZ POLLINATION, CONSERVATION, ERICACEAE, FRUIT PRODUCTION, FRUIT SET, HABROPODA, INCOMPLETE, OLIGOLECTY, POLLINATION, POLLINATION EFFICIENCY, POLLINATOR, VACCINIUM},
	author = {Cane, J. H.}
}
@article {1534,
	title = {Pollination ecology of Vaccinium stamineum (Ericaceae: Vaccinioideae)},
	journal = {American Journal of Botany},
	volume = {72},
	year = {1985},
	month = {1985///},
	pages = {135 - 142},
	keywords = {BUZZ POLLINATION, ECOLOGY, ERICACEAE, MELITTIDAE, OLIGOLECTY, POLLINATION, VACCINIUM},
	author = {Cane, J. H. and Eickwort,G.C. and Wesley,F.R. and Spielholz,J.}
}
@article {1518,
	title = {Bees assess pollen returns while sonicating Solanum flowers},
	journal = {Oecologia (Berlin)},
	volume = {81},
	year = {1989},
	month = {1989///},
	pages = {289 - 294},
	keywords = {BOMBUS, BUZZ POLLINATION, COLLETIDAE, SOLANACEAE},
	author = {Buchmann,S.L. and Cane, J. H.}
}
@article {1541,
	title = {Foraging ecology of the bee Habropoda laboriosa (Hymenoptera: Anthophoridae), an oligolege of blueberries (Ericaceae: Vaccinium) in the southeastern United States},
	journal = {Annals of the Entomological Society of America},
	volume = {81},
	year = {1988},
	month = {1988///},
	pages = {419 - 427},
	keywords = {ANTHOPHORIDAE, APIDAE, Apoidea, BUZZ POLLINATION, ECOLOGY, ERICACEAE, FLORAL REWARDS-NECTAR, FLORAL REWARDS-POLLEN, HABROPODA, OLIGOLECTY, POLLINATION, POLLINATOR, VACCINIUM, VACCINIUM ASHEI},
	author = {Cane, J. H. and Payne,J.A.}
}
@article {1555,
	title = {Honey bees harvest pollen from the porose anthers of cranberries (Vaccinium macrocarpon)(Ericaceae)},
	journal = {American Bee Journal},
	volume = {133},
	year = {1993},
	month = {1993///},
	pages = {293 - 295},
	keywords = {APIDAE, APIS, BEHAVIOR-FORAGING, BUZZ POLLINATION, CRANBERRIES, ERICACEAE, FLORAL REWARDS-POLLEN, POLLEN, POLLINATOR, VACCINIUM},
	author = {Cane, J. H. and MacKenzie,K. and Schiffhauer,D.}
}
@article {1553,
	title = {Reproductive role of sterile pollen in Saurauia (Actinidiaceae), a cryptically dioecious neotropical tree},
	volume = {25},
	year = {1993},
	month = {1993///},
	pages = {493 - 495},
	keywords = {ACTINIDIACEAE, BUZZ POLLINATION, DIOECY, FLORAL REWARDS-POLLEN, Meliponini, POLLEN, POLLINATION, POLLINATOR, TREE, TROPICS},
	author = {Cane, J. H.}
}
@article {1554,
	title = {Reproductive role of sterile pollen in cryptically dioecious species of flowering plants},
	volume = {65},
	year = {1993},
	month = {1993///},
	pages = {223 - 225},
	abstract = {<p>Flowers of females from some species of dioecious flowering plants produce dysfunctional anthers or infertile pollen. Their cryptic dioecy has frequently been mistaken for androdioecy. Earlier insights into androdioecy were drawn from sexual allocation theory. However, several cryptically dioecious taxa share a common pollination syndrome, including nectarless but showy flowers that bear yellow, often porose anthers. These flowers are visited solely by female bees seeking pollen. For these cases, cryptic dioecy is explained by pollinator foraging behavior and not sexual allocation theory. Pollen as a nutritional reward to foraging bees is largely overlooked in current studies of pollination and foraging ecology</p>
},
	keywords = {ACTINIDIACEAE, ANDRODIOECY, Apoidea, BEHAVIOR, BUZZ POLLINATION, DIOECY, ECOLOGY, FLOWERING, POLLEN, POLLINATION, POLLINATOR},
	author = {Cane, J. H.}
}
@article {1626,
	title = {Temporal patterns of floral visitation for two bees foraging at Solanum},
	journal = {Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society},
	volume = {66},
	year = {1993},
	month = {1993///},
	pages = {319 - 327},
	keywords = {APIDAE, BEHAVIOR-FORAGING, BOMBUS, BUZZ POLLINATION, COLLETIDAE, COMPETITION, FLORAL REWARDS-POLLEN, PHENOLOGY, POLLEN REMOVAL, RESOURCE PARTITIONING, SOLANACEAE},
	author = {Shelly,T.E. and Villalobos,E.M. and Buchmann,S.L. and Cane, J. H.}
}
@article {1560,
	title = {Pollination, foraging, and nesting ecology of the leaf-cutting bee Megachile (Delomegachile) addenda (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) on cranberry beds},
	journal = {Annals of the Entomological Society of America},
	volume = {89},
	year = {1996},
	month = {1996///},
	pages = {361 - 367},
	keywords = {BEHAVIOR-FORAGING, BEHAVIOR-MATING, BEHAVIOR-NESTING, BUZZ POLLINATION, CLEPTOPARASITE, CRANBERRIES, ECOLOGY, ERICACEAE, MEGACHILE, Megachilidae, POLLEN LOAD- BEE, POLLEN LOAD- STIGMA, POLLEN PRODUCTION, POLLEN REMOVAL, POLLINATION, POLLINATION EFFICIENCY, POLLINATOR, SOIL, VACCINIUM},
	author = {Cane, J. H. and Schiffhauer,D. and Kervin,L.J.}
}
@article {1616,
	title = {What governs protein content of pollen: Pollinator preferences, pollen-pistil interactions, or phylogeny?},
	journal = {Ecol.Monog.},
	volume = {70},
	year = {2000},
	month = {2000///},
	pages = {617 - 643},
	abstract = {Pollen ranges from 2.5\% to 61\% protein content. Most pollen proteins are likely to be enzymes that function during pollen tube growth and subsequent fertilization, but the vast range of protein quantity may not reflect only pollen-pistil interactions. Because numerous vertebrate and invertebrate floral visitors consume pollen for protein, protein content may influence floral host choice. Additionally, many floral visitors pollinate their host plants. If protein content influences pollinator visitation, then pollinators are hypothesized to select for increased protein content of host plants. We analyzed or gleaned from the literature crude pollen protein concentrations of 377 plant species from 93 plant families. Using this database, we compared pollen protein concentration with (1) pollination mode, (2) pollen collection by bees, and (3) distance from stigma to ovule, after accounting for phylogeny through paired phylogenetic comparisons and a nested ANOVA including taxonomic rank. We found that pollen protein concentrations were highly conserved within plant genera, families, and divisions. We found that bees did not collect pollen that was unusually rich in protein, whether they pollinated or merely robbed their host plant. Plant species with vibratile pollination systems, which require visitation by pollen-collecting bees in order to transfer pollen, tended to have very protein-rich pollen, but it was not clear whether this was due to plant enhancement of pollinator rewards or to the possession of very small pollen grains. We found that zoophilous species were not statistically richer in pollen protein than anemophilous species after accounting for phylogeny, although the three most species-rich anemophilous clades surveyed were generally poor in protein. Plant genera hosting specialist pollen-collecting bees did not have particularly protein-rich pollen. Both mass of protein per pollen grain and pollen grain volume were correlated with stigma-ovule distance. We suggest that the need for growing pollen tubes probably plays a more important role in determining pollen protein content than rewarding pollinators},
	keywords = {ANEMOPHILY, BUZZ POLLINATION, COEVOLUTION, EVOLUTION, PHYLOGENY, POLLEN, POLLEN TUBE, POLLEN-CHEMISTRY, POLLINATION, POLLINATOR, PROTEIN, STIGMA, VARIATION},
	author = {Roulston,T.H. and Cane, J. H. and Buchmann,S.L.}
}
