Zikanapis rozenorum (Michener, Engel & Ayala, 2003)
Caupolicana rozenorum and C. inbio are noteworthy because of the very striking difference in the metatibial shape and setation but near absence of other diff erences. The differentiating characters other than the metatibia listed in the original description of the male of C. rozenorum are not reliable. The middle flagellar segments of C. inbio are sometimes about 1.5 times as long as broad as described for C. rozenorum. The punctures on the shining central part of the lower half of the clypeus are more widely scattered in C. rozenorum than in the available specimens of C. inbio, but the difference is not impressive and intergradations is probable. The integument is generally paler in C. inbio than in C. rozenorum; thus the flagellum is brown to blackish, darker above than below, in C. inbio whereas it is blackish, dark brown below, in C. rozenorum. Moreover, the legs are brown with the metabasitarsus yellowish in C. inbio, whereas the legs including the metabasitarsus are dark brown in C. rozenorum. The setae on the outer surfaces of the meso- and metatibiae are mostly pale in C. inbio, mostly somewhat dusky in C. rozenorum, the darkness varying with the angle of illumination. The supposed diff erence in dark apices of the mesosomal pile does not exist. An additional apparent difference is in the ocellocular distance, which, although given as 0.15 OD for both species in the original descriptions, seems to be less in C. rozenorum; this apparently does not apply to all specimens.